Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(0, 1, x) → f(h(x), h(x), x)
h(0) → 0
h(g(x, y)) → y
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(0, 1, x) → f(h(x), h(x), x)
h(0) → 0
h(g(x, y)) → y
Q is empty.
Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(0, 1, x) → H(x)
F(0, 1, x) → F(h(x), h(x), x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(0, 1, x) → f(h(x), h(x), x)
h(0) → 0
h(g(x, y)) → y
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(0, 1, x) → H(x)
F(0, 1, x) → F(h(x), h(x), x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(0, 1, x) → f(h(x), h(x), x)
h(0) → 0
h(g(x, y)) → y
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(0, 1, x) → F(h(x), h(x), x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(0, 1, x) → f(h(x), h(x), x)
h(0) → 0
h(g(x, y)) → y
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.